<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vintage Reports</title>
	<link>http://blog.snooth.com/2009/01/14/vintage-reports/</link>
	<description>Find Better Wines</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://blog.snooth.com/2009/01/14/vintage-reports/#comment-6267</link>
		<author>Philip</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.snooth.com/2009/01/14/vintage-reports/#comment-6267</guid>
					<description>Dan - how do he 06's compare with the 05's? My general sense of Napa wines from 05 (huge generalizations here) are that they are very fruity, and often have a hot licorice quality to them - i'm guessing it was a hot dry year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan - how do he 06&#8217;s compare with the 05&#8217;s? My general sense of Napa wines from 05 (huge generalizations here) are that they are very fruity, and often have a hot licorice quality to them - i&#8217;m guessing it was a hot dry year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
