<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rating changes</title>
	<link>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/</link>
	<description>Find Better Wines</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Wine Ratings Revisted</title>
		<link>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-299</link>
		<author>Wine Ratings Revisted</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-299</guid>
					<description>[...] great to see other Wine 2.0 sites support this proposal (thanks, Philip, and great Facebook app!) and I expect others to follow. For devotees of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] great to see other Wine 2.0 sites support this proposal (thanks, Philip, and great Facebook app!) and I expect others to follow. For devotees of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wine Ratings Revisited &#187; Minnesota Realty Blog n News</title>
		<link>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-300</link>
		<author>Wine Ratings Revisited &#187; Minnesota Realty Blog n News</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-300</guid>
					<description>[...] great to see other Wine 2.0 sites support this proposal (thanks, Philip, and great Facebook app!) and I expect others to follow. For devotees of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] great to see other Wine 2.0 sites support this proposal (thanks, Philip, and great Facebook app!) and I expect others to follow. For devotees of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFWEG</title>
		<link>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-446</link>
		<author>SFWEG</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-446</guid>
					<description>Please hurry up with the 1/2 glass icons.  While the 100 (=30) pt. system is unnaturally precise, a 5 point system is too inexact and blunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please hurry up with the 1/2 glass icons.  While the 100 (=30) pt. system is unnaturally precise, a 5 point system is too inexact and blunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wine Ratings Revisited &#187; California Wine Country Tour</title>
		<link>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-1430</link>
		<author>Wine Ratings Revisited &#187; California Wine Country Tour</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.snooth.com/2007/07/24/rating-changes/#comment-1430</guid>
					<description>[...] great to see other Wine 2.0 sites support this proposal (thanks, Philip, and great Facebook app!) and I expect others to follow. For devotees of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] great to see other Wine 2.0 sites support this proposal (thanks, Philip, and great Facebook app!) and I expect others to follow. For devotees of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
